The Civilization vs. The Tool

Harvey is one AI that routes your queries to different models. It is an expensive, sophisticated paralegal. When you submit a complex M&A question, it processes sequentially — research, then drafting, then review. One brain. One bottleneck. One very large invoice.

Hancock deploys a civilization. Research Lead coordinates specialist agents pulling precedent simultaneously. Legal Lead orchestrates drafting while Research is still working. Comms Lead prepares the client summary. These are parallel intelligences — the way a real legal team works.

Every senior partner knows the feeling of watching a $50M deal stall because one associate is the bottleneck. Hancock is the team you always deserved — not another tool that makes one person slightly faster.

"Harvey shows you a spinner. Hancock shows you a war room. Six specialist agents visible and working — each one accountable, each one observable, each one named."

Hancock Architecture Brief

Why Harvey Fails at Scale

The pricing wall. $288,000 before you've proven a single dollar of ROI. Twenty seats minimum even if only six partners use it. A pricing page that returns 404 — literally. Harvey designed their sales model for Harvey's revenue, not your firm's risk tolerance.

The knowledge lock-in. Harvey's institutional knowledge lives in firm-specific Vaults inside Harvey's Azure infrastructure. Your most sensitive M&A files, your custom workflows — they build switching costs, not value. Every pattern your firm discovers enriches Harvey's training data, not your civilization.

The agentic gap. Harvey's agentic workflows are "still maturing" — their own positioning. 25,000+ custom workflows are prompt templates with routing logic, not autonomous agent orchestration. When you need a multi-step pipeline to run without hand-holding, Harvey asks you to wait.

The transparency void. Harvey is a black box with a beautiful interface. You ask a question, you get an answer. What happened in between? Which sources? Which decisions? You have no idea — and no recourse if the answer is wrong. Lawyers are trained to interrogate reasoning. Harvey asks them to take conclusions on faith.

Meet Your Agents by Name

Every agent is named. Every agent has a specialization. Every agent has a history. This is not a directory — it is a legal team roster. You know who is doing your work.

M
MARCUS
Contract Review Specialist
7,200 contracts reviewed. Specializes in SaaS licensing, M&A agreements, and IP licensing. Flags material deviations from firm standard. Generates redline-ready output.
Available — 0 active matters
E
ELENA
Regulatory & Compliance
Jurisdictions: EU, US Federal, UK, Canada. 3 years of your firm's regulatory history in memory. Monitors 6 regulatory bodies continuously. Drafts client alerts within hours of material changes.
Active — GDPR Article 17 analysis
D
DAVID
Litigation Support
Deposition prep, document review, contradiction mapping, timeline reconstruction. Processes 40,000-document productions. Surfaces the three moments where testimony and documents diverge most sharply.
Available — last matter closed 2h ago
S
SARAH
Due Diligence Lead
M&A target analysis, overnight brief delivery. Coordinates Corporate, Litigation, IP, Regulatory, and Contract agents simultaneously. Synthesizes findings into tiered risk registers.
Available — Meridian brief delivered 07:58
R
ROMAN
Legal Research
Case law, statute, and regulation synthesis across 50+ years of precedent. Surfaces ranked, cited answers from your firm's actual prior work. Reads for meaning — not just keywords.
Available — precedent library indexed
C
CLAIRE
Client Communications
Drafts client memos, alert letters, and matter updates. Routes through firm approval workflow. Customizes every memo to client's specific disclosure posture and prior correspondence history.
Available — 23 alert memos queued
T
THOMAS
Training & Development
Junior lawyer mentorship simulations. Mock drafting sessions with partner-level feedback. Skills gap analysis. Harvey has no equivalent. This is a $40K/year associate cost reduction story.
Available — Harvey has no analog
B
BILLING AGENT
Matter Billing & Time Capture
Agent work logs automatically feed time capture. Matter budget dashboards. Invoice narrative drafted from agent activity. Integrated from the foundation — not bolted on.
Available — Harvey has no analog
I
INTAKE AGENT
Matter Intake & Conflict Check
New client onboarding, scope definition, and conflict screening before engagement. Runs against your full client and matter database. Surfaces potential conflicts before the first billable hour.
Available — Harvey has no analog

Data Sovereignty. Not a Feature. A Foundation.

Harvey runs on Microsoft Azure. Your client matters, your firm's institutional knowledge, your custom workflows — all of it lives in Harvey's infrastructure. They call it a "Vault." You don't own the vault. You rent space in theirs. Renewal leverage is structural.

Every Hancock deployment runs in isolated Docker containers on infrastructure you control. Your civilization is yours — your agents, your memory, your accumulated knowledge. When you leave, you take everything. There is no hostage situation at renewal.

Law firms are fiduciaries. Client confidentiality isn't a feature — it's the entire profession. We will sign a DPA, an NDA, and a data sovereignty agreement before your first login. Not after.

Hancock Deployment Architecture — Data Boundary Diagram
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ YOUR FIRM'S DOCKER CONTAINER (network-isolated, your infra) │
│ │
┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐
│ MARCUS │ │ ELENA │ │ DAVID │ │ SARAH │
│ Contract │ │Regulatory│ │Litigation│ │Due Dilig.│
└──────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘
│ │
memories/ (your firm's knowledge — lives here, nowhere else)
legal/matters/, precedents/, clients/, compliance/
│ │
│ ════════════════ NETWORK BOUNDARY ════════════════════════════ │
│ Only anonymized PATTERNS cross this boundary → Legal Guild │
│ Client identity, case specifics, privileged comms: NEVER │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Harvey cannot show you this slide. This boundary does not exist for them.

The Legal Guild

Harvey's institutional knowledge lives in firm-specific Vaults. Every firm rediscovers the same contract patterns, the same regulatory precedents, the same workflow solutions — in isolation. You pay premium price for a product that gets smarter for Harvey, not for you.

The Legal Guild is a cooperative knowledge commons. When a Hancock firm in Chicago optimizes an FCPA compliance workflow, that pattern propagates. When a London firm develops a novel cross-border restructuring approach, that intelligence compounds. Your files never leave your container. The wisdom does.

"Harvey charges you $288K/year to lock your firm's knowledge inside their platform. Hancock charges you per month to run your own legal AI — and every template, skill, and playbook you contribute to The Guild comes back to you as 50 other firms' collective intelligence."

Explore The Legal Guild →

The Page Harvey Won't Show You

Harvey's pricing page returns 404. Their minimum is $288,000/year. They require 20 seats before you've proven a single dollar of ROI. We show our pricing. Right here. Without a form gate.

Solo
$149
per month
1–2 lawyer practice. All core Hancock agents. Legal Guild starter access. Memory builds from day one.
Popular
Boutique
$399
per month
Up to 8 lawyers. Full Legal Guild membership. Unlimited matters. Dedicated Hancock instance.
Practice
$899
per month
Up to 25 lawyers. Full network participation. Custom agent configurations. Priority support.
Firm
Custom
starts ~$1,800/mo
25+ lawyers. Full civilization deployment. Custom agent names. On-premise option. Direct API.

Harvey's minimum: $288,000/year. Our maximum before enterprise: $10,788/year. You do the math.

Harvey vs. Hancock — Every Dimension

We don't cherry-pick. Here is a comprehensive comparison across every dimension that matters to a managing partner.

Harvey.ai Hancock
Entry Price$288,000/year (20-seat min)$149/month — 1 lawyer Win
Pricing Transparency404 Not FoundPublished. This page. Right now. Win
ArchitectureOne AI, sequential processing50+ agents, true parallel execution Win
Agent TransparencyBlack box — see answers, not reasoningNamed agents, visible work, observable reasoning Win
Data OwnershipHarvey's Azure cloud — you rent spaceYour Docker container — full export anytime Win
Knowledge SharingSiloed — each firm learns aloneLegal Guild — 50 firms share patterns, zero share secrets Win
SMB / Small Firm AccessNo path — 20-seat minimum walls out 4,000+ firmsBuilt for the firms Harvey ignores Win
Onboarding Time4–8 weeks minimumUnder 8 minutes — self-serve Win
Free TrialNoneFirst query free — no card required Win
Agentic Maturity"Still maturing" — per their roadmapAgent civilization from the foundation Win
Junior TrainingHarvey Academy (tutorials only) — no simulationTHOMAS — mock drafting, skills gap scoring, partner feedback Win
Billing IntegrationNoBuilt in — agent work logs feed time capture Win
Conflict CheckingNoINTAKE agent — runs before first billable hour Win
Vendor Lock-in RiskHigh — leaving = losing all AI-embedded precedentsNone — memory architecture is portable Win
Legal Research Sources400+ external sources (LexisNexis partnership) Advantage HarveyInternal precedent library + Guild contributions + public sources
DMS IntegrationsiManage, NetDocuments, SharePoint, GDrive Advantage HarveyOpen API — integrations on roadmap
Enterprise CertificationsSOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA Advantage HarveySOC 2 in progress — DPA + NDA before first login
Market Penetration100K lawyers, 60 AmLaw 100 firms Advantage HarveyFirst-mover in cooperative commons, SMB, transparent pricing

The Five-Year Vision

Harvey's moat is institutional knowledge lock-in at enterprise prices. Our moat is institutional knowledge ownership at human prices — and a cooperative commons that compounds exponentially with every new firm that joins.

Year 1
50 founding firms. Legal Guild launches. Named agents become the legal AI standard. Every mid-market firm in the US has heard of Hancock.
Year 2
500 firms. Guild reaches critical mass — 10,000+ contributed templates. Hancock agents begin appearing in law school curricula. Junior lawyer training disruption begins.
Year 3
Hancock enters BigLaw. A firm names their agents publicly. The narrative flips: having named AI agents becomes a recruiting advantage for associates.
Year 5
The Legal Guild is the de facto knowledge infrastructure for the legal profession. Hancock's cooperative commons has accumulated what no single firm — or Harvey — can replicate.